IJRDT international journal with high impact factor and low publication fee

For all manuscripts, the corresponding author should be required to provide information on the specific contributions each author has made to the article. All authors are responsible for the quality, accuracy, and ethics of the work, but one author must be identified who will reply if questions arise or more information is needed, and who will take responsibility for the work as a whole.

IJRDT is international journal with high impact factor 3.82

Authors are informed that they have to follow the following steps for successful submitting manuscripts.

  • Prepare your original research work in Microsoft word as per the given format on the website.
  • Paper template can be downloaded on the download link given on IJRDT website.
  • Submit your manuscript from our online manuscript submission system. Go to Submit manuscript link.
  • Research Paper will be send for the review process. Authors will be informed via Email Within 5  Days After submission of Manuscripts.
  • After acceptance send us scanned filled copy of copyright form available on website.
  • After acceptance Complete Procedure of Publication fees Payment. Bank details will be sent by Email. And For foreign Author they can pay via PAY Pal account.  For more detail Go to Publication Fess menu.
  • Without completion all the above procedure Paper cant published online so kindly complete all the procedure regarding paper publication in time.

International journal with low publication fee

International journal publication fee 1000              



IJRDT indexing

IJRDT indexed in different digital libraries. Dear Author Other indexing in under processing IJRDT is a Global Platform on which you can explore your hidden Potential.By indexing IJRDT upload Research paper in Different Reputed Digital libraries.

Please visit :- http://ijrdt.org/content_display/36/Journal%20Indexing

What exactly is the peer review process? 

          Professional evaluation is a vital scientific publication process and the diffusion of information and knowledge. Professional evaluators are experts chosen by publishers to provide published evaluation of the strong points and weak points of published analysis, with the purpose of improving the confirming of analysis and determining the most appropriate and finest high quality material for the publication. Regular evaluators should be instructed to fulfill minimal criteria (as identified and promulgated) regarding their qualifications in unique analysis, publication of articles, official training, and past crucial evaluation of manuscripts. Professional evaluators should be experts in the particular subject resolved in the content they evaluation, and should be chosen for their detachment and scientific knowledge. Those who do not have such skills should not be evaluators, and in that respect is no part for overview of content by individuals who hold a major competitive interest in the subject of the stipulation.

The publishers should regularly evaluate all opinions for quality; they may also modify opinions before publishing them to writers, or simply not post them if they sense they are not beneficial or appropriate. Ratings of review high quality and other efficiency features of evaluators should be regularly analyzed to ensure maximum efficiency, and must lead to choices on reappointment or continuous evaluation demands. Individual efficiency information may be presented for evaluators and it must be held secret.

The presented manuscript is a privileged communication; evaluators must address it as private. It should not be retained or duplicated. Also, evaluators must not discuss the manuscript with any colleagues without the precise authorization of the editor. Reviewers and publishers must not gain whatever personal or professional use of the information, justifications, or understanding (other than those straight impacted in its peer review) prior to publication unless they have the authors’ particular authorization or are writing an article or opinion to go along with the article.

High-quality evaluation is important, but similarly significant is that instructors are able to easily determine which material of the publication are peer analyzed. The publication should explain which types of content are peer analyzed, and by whom (IE, only by article chosen board members, by outside professional evaluators, or both). Editors should highly look at having a statistician evaluation review of unique query that is being considered for publication, if this possible, since reviews have confirmed.

Editors should publish annual/proceedings audits of approval rates, book durations, and amount of distribution sent out for external peer evaluation, and other function information.